Volume 6, Issue 3 (Autumn 2023)
Iranian Journal of Educational Sociology 2023, 6(3): 182-190 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Ghanbari M, Abbasian E, Mira S A. (2023). Providing a Customer Value Maturity Model based on the Dynamic Capabilities of Educational Institutions. Iranian Journal of Educational Sociology. 6(3), 182-190. doi:10.61186/ijes.6.3.182
URL: http://iase-idje.ir/article-1-1364-en.html
URL: http://iase-idje.ir/article-1-1364-en.html
1- Department of Public Administration, Faculty of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
2- Associate Professor, Department of Public Administration, Faculty of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
2- Associate Professor, Department of Public Administration, Faculty of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract: (224 Views)
Purpose: Education is one of the important factors of economic and social development and the education industry is one of the largest and most tangible industries in the world. Therefore, the aim of this study was to providing a customer value maturity model based on the dynamic capabilities of educational institutions.
Methodology: This study in terms of purpose was applied and in terms of implementation method was qualitative. In this study number of 15 people after checking the inclusion criteria such as work experience of at least 10 years and at least bachelor's education with using the purposive sampling method were selected from among the experts of non-governmental educational institutions of the senior school in Tehran city. The tool of the current research was a semi-structured interview with selected experts, which its validity was confirmed by the triangulation method and its reliability was calculated by the method of the coefficient of agreement between two coding 0.88. Data were analyzed by content analysis method.
Findings: The results of the present study indicated that for the customer value maturity model based on the dynamic capabilities of educational institutions were identified number of 268 open codes in 5 core codes or levels, respectively including the analysis the value proposition of customer, definition and design the value proposition of customer, management and expansion the value proposition of customer, implementation and execution the value proposition of customer and evaluation and optimization the value proposition of customer. Therefore, the educational programs in the customer value maturity model based on the dynamic capabilities of educational institutions were drawn at five levels based on the level of maturity and value.
Conclusion: According to the identified codes and levels for the customer value maturity model based on the dynamic capabilities of educational institutions can be taken an effective step in the direction of customer value maturity.
Methodology: This study in terms of purpose was applied and in terms of implementation method was qualitative. In this study number of 15 people after checking the inclusion criteria such as work experience of at least 10 years and at least bachelor's education with using the purposive sampling method were selected from among the experts of non-governmental educational institutions of the senior school in Tehran city. The tool of the current research was a semi-structured interview with selected experts, which its validity was confirmed by the triangulation method and its reliability was calculated by the method of the coefficient of agreement between two coding 0.88. Data were analyzed by content analysis method.
Findings: The results of the present study indicated that for the customer value maturity model based on the dynamic capabilities of educational institutions were identified number of 268 open codes in 5 core codes or levels, respectively including the analysis the value proposition of customer, definition and design the value proposition of customer, management and expansion the value proposition of customer, implementation and execution the value proposition of customer and evaluation and optimization the value proposition of customer. Therefore, the educational programs in the customer value maturity model based on the dynamic capabilities of educational institutions were drawn at five levels based on the level of maturity and value.
Conclusion: According to the identified codes and levels for the customer value maturity model based on the dynamic capabilities of educational institutions can be taken an effective step in the direction of customer value maturity.
References
1. Arthur R, Nicholson A, Sibani P, Christensen M. (2016) The tangled nature model for organizational ecology. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory. 23(1): 1-31. doi:10.1007.s10588-016-9214-4 [DOI:10.1007/s10588-016-9214-4]
2. Ceresia F. (2017). Sunny Island. An interactive learning environment to promote systems thinking education for primary school students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 237: 980-985. doi: 10.1016.j.sbspro.2017.02.139 [DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2017.02.139]
3. Donaldson L. (2009). Organization theory as a positive science. Oxford Publisher: In Book of The Oxford Handbook of Organization Theory: 39-62. doi: 10.1093.oxfordhb.9780199275250.003.0002 [DOI:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199275250.003.0002]
4. HabibiDost M, Fadavi MS, Farhadi H. (2021). Identification and pathology of organizational syndromes in education. Iranian Journal of Educational Sociology. 4(2): 127-138. 10.52547.ijes.4.2.127
5. Hannan MT, Freeman J. (1997). Organizational ecology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
6. Khodadadi A, Tavakoli M, Anabestani A. (2022). An analysis of effective factors on the management of ecological and social complexities in the preservation of rural natural resources (Case study: Villages of Lorestan province). Journal of Geography and Environmental Hazards. 11(1): 279-303. [Persian] doi: 10.22067.geoeh.2022.72675.1112
7. Manjula M, Lingappan V, Mukhopadhyay P, Kumar L. (2016). Ecosystem services approach for revitalizing agriculture in India. Current Science. 116(5): 723-727. doi: 10.18520.cs.v116.i5.723-727 [DOI:10.18520/cs/v116/i5/723-727]
8. Mehta M, Teymouri M, Puthuparampil-Mehta B, Sawh C, Paty P, Kostun ZW, et al. (2023). Outcomes of the V-Healthy education and awareness program that empowers high school students to understand and diagnose vascular disease risk factors. Journal of Vascular Surgery. 77(4): 1245-1249. doi: 10.1016.j.jvs.2022.12.014 [DOI:10.1016/j.jvs.2022.12.014]
9. Moghali A, Darvish H, Abbasi N, Mohammadi F. (2016). Study and ranking the factors influencing on transformational organization model in Fars education organization (Case study: Fars province education organization). Public Management Researches. 9(31): 29-50. [Persian] doi: 10.22111.jmr.2016.2512
10. Nasiri ValikBani FS, Gholtash A, Sarchahani Z. (2016). The relationship between employee empowerment and job performance and productivity of manpower in the department of education of Fars province. Journal of Managing Education in Organizations. 4(2): 63-90. [Persian]
11. Ozturk O, Dil E. (2022). Bibliometric analysis of organizational ecology theory (OET): To review past for directing the future of the field. Ege Akademik Bakis Dergisi. 22(2): 195-212. doi: 10.21121.eab.980638 [DOI:10.21121/eab.980638]
12. Roth S. (2014). Booties, bounties, business models: A map to the next red oceans. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business. 22(4): 439-448. doi: 10.1504.IJESB.2014.064272 [DOI:10.1504/IJESB.2014.064272]
13. Sadr M, Etebariyan A, Ebrahimzadeh R, Pirvavi Vanak M. (2019). Typology of cultural organizations based on the organizational population ecology: Repertory grid approach. Quarterly Journal of Public Organizations Management. 7(1): 41-66. doi: 10.30473.ipom.2019.38773.3057
14. Tezer M, Ozrecberoglu N. (2015). Students' view of the problems faced with the measurement and evaluation system in the primary school mathematics education system. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 186: 856-861. doi: 10.1016.j.sbspro.2015.04.196 [DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.196]
15. Tilley JL. (2023). School resources, peer inputs, and student outcomes in adult education. Economics of Education Review. 96: 102441. doi: 10.1016.j.econedurev.2023.102441 [DOI:10.1016/j.econedurev.2023.102441]
16. Vark A, Reino A. (2020). Practice ecology of knowledge management-connecting the formal, informal and personal. Journal of Documentation. 77(1): 163-180. doi: 10.1108.JD-03-2020-0043 [DOI:10.1108/JD-03-2020-0043]
17. Wang Z. (2021). Mind the gap: Examining migrant-native disparities in reading performance and subjective wellbeing among 15-year-old students in different education systems. International Journal of Educational Research Open. 2: 100087. doi: 10.1016.j.ijedro.2021.100087 [DOI:10.1016/j.ijedro.2021.100087]
18. Yazdani Ghadi S, Jabari N, Azma F. (2023). Presenting the development model of educational organizations with emphasis on the entrepreneurship drivers in higher education. Iranian Journal of Educational Sociology. 6(3): 33-42.
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
.jpg)
